This article discusses the recent controversy surrounding the sport of ultimate frisbee. It focuses on the debate between traditionalists and the modernists regarding the sport's rulebook and the need for rules enforcement. The traditionalists see ultimate as a non-structured, self-refereed sport that emphasizes sportsmanship and respect, while the modernists advocate for more structure, consistent rules, and increased enforcement. The article looks at both sides of the controversy, provides insight into how social media has played a role in fueling the debate, and offers suggestions on how the differences between the two sides can be bridged.